检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江西农业大学动物科学技术学院,江西南昌330045
出 处:《江西农业大学学报》2008年第5期850-854,共5页Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis
基 金:国家自然科学基金(30660129);江西省自然科学基金(2007GZN0702);江西省科技厅农业科技攻关项目(20061B0201500);江西省教育厅项目(GJJ08181)共同资助
摘 要:选用1日龄的泰和乌骨鸡,分为对照组(基础日粮)、试验组Ⅰ(基础日粮+1%Ⅰ号中草药)、试验组Ⅱ(基础日粮+1%Ⅱ号中草药)和试验组Ⅲ(基础日粮+1%Ⅲ号中草药),共4组,每组设3个重复,每个重复15只鸡,共180羽。分0-4周龄、5-8周龄、9-12周龄3个阶段,通过饲养试验研究各不同调和气血中草药添加剂对泰和乌骨鸡生长性能的影响。试验结果表明:6周龄前对照组泰和乌骨鸡日增重比试验组高,6周龄后试验组与对照组差距越来越小,试验组I在第10、12周龄的日增重均高于对照组,试验组Ⅱ在第10周龄时日增重也高于对照组,但它们差异均不显著(P〉0.05)。日采食量也显示同样的趋势,第6周龄后,试验组的日采食量均高于对照组,特别是在第10-12周龄时试验组Ⅱ的日采食量显著的高于对照组(P〈0.05)。4-6周龄各中草药添加剂组料重比低于对照组,但差异不显著(P〉0.05),其它周龄均比对照组高,特别是在6-8周龄时试验组Ⅱ显著高于对照组(P〈0.05)。全期死亡率除试验组Ⅲ外,其它试验组与对照组相比有下降的趋势,其中试验组Ⅰ的死亡率最低,比对照组下降了4.44个百分点。腹泻率以对照组最高,占总鸡数的3.89%,试验组Ⅰ的腹泻率最低,比对照组下降了8.89个百分点。One hundred and eighty one - day old Taihe silky fowls were randomly allotted to 4 groups with 3 replicates of 15 birds each. The birds were fed with the basal diet (control group), basal diet supplemented with 1.0% Chinese herbal additive prescription Ⅰ ( group Ⅰ), basal diet supplemented with 1.0% Chinese herbal additive prescription Ⅱ (group Ⅱ) and basal diet supplemented with 1.0% Chinese herbal additive prescription Ⅲ(group Ⅲ) for three periods (0 -4 weeks of age, 5 -8 weeks of age and 9 - 12 weeks of age), respectively. Breeding and slaughtering trials were conducted to investigate the effects of different Chinese herbal additive prescriptions on the growth performance in Taihe silky fowls. The results were as follows:The average daily gain (ADG) of the control group was higer than that of the Chinese herbal additive treatment groups before 6 weeks of age, but the difference decreased subsequently. The ADGs in group Ⅰ at 10 12 weeksof age and group Ⅱat 10 weeks of age were higher than that of the control group, but no significant difference was observed between these groups (P 〉 0.05 ). Average daily feed intake (ADFI) of Chinese herbal additive treatment groups was higher than that of the control group, especially at 10 - 12 weeks of age the ADFI of group Ⅱ was significantly higher than that of the control group (P 〈 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the Chinese herbal additive treatment groups and the control group, while the ratio of feed to gain (F/G) of the Chinese herbal additive treatment groups was lower than that of the control group at 4 - 6 weeks of age. However, the F/G of group Ⅱ was significantly higher than that of control group (P 〈 0.05). The death percentage of the Chinese herbal additive treatment groups had a decline trend compared to the control group except for group Ⅲ. The death percentage of group Ⅱ being the lowest, decreased by 4.44 compared to the control group. Group Ⅰ had the lowest
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31