检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《新闻界》2008年第5期131-134,145,共5页Journalism and Mass Communication
基 金:"网络媒体的管理模式研究"博士点基金项目。
摘 要:美国和新加坡的网络色情管制模式各有鲜明的特色。美国强调尊重公民言论表达自由,数次网络色情管制立法均以违宪裁定告终,目前采取以业者自律为主的引导式模式,宽松而灵活;新加坡则重视维护公共道德,制定法律管制色情信息,采取强制性的立法介入模式,严格而务实。本文从管制宗旨、原则、主体、标准和措施等方面比较两国网络色情管制异同,从而为文化背景相似的国家提供借鉴。The Americans and the Singaporeans have quite different ways to control Internet Pornography. In the U.S., citizens 'fi'eedom of expression is highly respected, and several legislative efforts for restricting lnternet pornography were ruled out as unconstitutional. A loose and flexible self-disciplinary pattern of management within professional circles is adopted as the major trend. In Singapore, however, the maintenance of common moral standards are stressed, and strict and effective laws and policies were formulated for coercive lntemet pornography censorship. This essay is to compare the purpose, principles, actors, standards and measures for Internet pornography censorship in the two countries, to find out the differences and similarities, and provide information for countries with similar cultural traditions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145