检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕守军[1,2]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院,上海200030 [2]复旦大学经济学院,上海200433
出 处:《经济经纬》2008年第6期50-53,共4页Economic Survey
基 金:中国博士后科学基金(20060400153);上海市浦江人才计划;复旦大学985项目
摘 要:全球公共物品理论为全球化问题的解决提供了新思路。然而,中国的学术界对于全球公共物品理论的理解,还存在莫衷一是的现象,并倾向于把全球公共物品理论与国际公共物品理论混为一谈。这不仅制约了全球公共物品理论运用的效果,也影响了该理论的发展。为此,本文通过对全球公共物品理论和国际公共物品理论的辨析,提出了应该从三个维度来理解和认识全球公共物品理论的观点,进而对全球公共物品理论对传统公共物品理论的拓展问题进行了研究,旨在为全球化问题的解决提供正确的理论基础。The theory of global public goods has provided new ideas for solving globalization problems. However, the Chinese academic circle is unable to decide which understanding is right about the theory of global public goods and tends to confuse it with the theory of international public goods, which not only restricts the application effect of global public goods theory, but also affects the development of the theory. Therefore, the author makes a distinction between the theory of global public goods and the theory of international public goods, advances that the theory of global public goods should be understood from three - dimensions and then researches the development of the theory of global public goods on the basis of the traditional theory of public goods, aiming to provide a correct theoretical foundation for solving globalization problems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.149.253.148