检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林瑞娇[1] 陈煌辉[1] 郑振英[1] 钱之远[1] 陈少全[1]
出 处:《解放军护理杂志》2008年第21期16-17,共2页Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
摘 要:目的观察坐骨直肠间隙脓肿切开引流术后采用两种不同治疗方式的疗效。方法将30例坐骨直肠间隙脓肿患者随机分为封闭式负压冲吸器治疗组(实验组)15例和传统的凡士林纱布换药治疗组(对照组)15例,比较两组患者的换药次数、切口长度、创腔愈合天数和治疗费用。结果两组患者全部治愈。但实验组所需的伤口长度、换药次数、创腔愈合天数、治疗费用均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论采用封闭式负压冲吸治疗坐骨直肠间隙脓肿是高效、经济可行的方法,可有效地提高临床护理的质量,减轻患者的痛苦。Objective To compare therapeutic effects of two dressing change methods in patients with incision and drainage for ischiorectal abscess. Methods Thirty cases with isehiorectal abscess were evenly divided into closed washing and aspiration device treatment group (experimental group, n =15) and the traditional treatment by dressing with kpetrolatum gauze group (control group, n = 15). Dressing frequency, length of incision, days of wound healing, treatment cost were compared between two groups. Results All cases in two groups recovered. The dressing frequency, length of incision,days of wound healing and treatment cost in experimental group were significantly shorter or lower than those in control group( P 〈0.01). Conclusion Closed negative pressure washing and aspiration is an efficient, economic and feasible method in treating ischiorectal abscess. And it could effectively improve nursing qualities and reduce the patients' sufferings.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.71