检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李秉杰 杨德慧 武帅钦[2] 李伯森 孟浩 姜思朋 刘国军 赵月辉[2] 崔洪波[2] 周雪媚[2] 钟照华[2]
机构地区:[1]民政部一零一研究所,北京100070 [2]哈尔滨医科大学微生物学教研室
出 处:《中华预防医学杂志》2008年第11期831-835,共5页Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine
基 金:财政部2007年中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项课题(2007)
摘 要:目的研制纳米二氧化钛(TiO2)光催化空气净化消毒器,并测试其空气消毒净化效果。方法设计和制作纳米TiO2光催化空气净化消毒器样机。在封闭实验室将大肠埃希菌、克雷伯菌制成气雾,比较紫外线和纳米TiO2光催化空气净化消毒器消毒后残余细菌总数。在大型公共场所测试纳米TiO2光催化空气净化消毒器对空气净化和消毒的效率。结果纳米TiO2光催化空气净化消毒器由粗效过滤器、纳米TiO2光催化反应器、活性炭纤维吸附层、电空气负离子发生器和智能化微处理程序共5部分组成。纳米TiO2光催化法在30min、60min、90min、120min对空气大肠埃希菌的杀灭率分别为76.O%、81.8%、77.5%、80.7%。纳米TiO2光催化法上述时间点对空气克雷伯菌的杀灭率分别为78.4%、79.5%、67.3%、58.5%;30min、60min时间点紫外线对空气克雷伯菌的杀灭率56.1%、63.2%。结论纳米TiO2光催化空气净化消毒器的空气消毒效果等同或优于紫外线,可用于大型公共场所的空气净化和消毒作用。Objective To develop and evaluate the efficiency of air purification and sterilization instrument based on nano-sized TiO2 photocatalytic technique. Methods The nano-sized TiO2 photocatalytic air purification and sterilization instrument was designed and a sample had been prepared. The sterilization efficiencies for E. coli and Klebsiella by the nano-sized TiO2 photocatalytic instrument and ultraviolet (UV) were measured in closed labs. The on-site efficiency of the instrument was evaluated, too. Results The nano-sized TiO2 photocatalytic air purification and sterilization instrument was composed of five units: rough filter, nano-sized TiO2 photocatalytic unit, activated carbon fiber filter, negative ion generator, and programmed control unit. The E. coli killing rates by the nano-sized TiO2 photocatalytic instrument were 76.0%, 81.8%, 77. 5%, and 80. 7% at 30,60,90, and 120 minutes, respectively. There was no significant difference between the E. coli killing rates of the instrument and UV ( P 〉 0.05 ), except the 120 minutes timepoint. The Klebsiella killing rates by the instrument were 78.4%, 79. 5 %, 67.3 %, and 58.5% at 30,60,90 ,and 120 minutes,respectively. The Klebsiella killing efficiencies of the instrument at 30 and 60 minutes were better than that of UV ( P 〈 0. 01 ). There was no significant difference between the Klebsiella killing efficiencies of the instrument and UV ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion The air sterilization efficiency of the nano-sized TiO2 photocatalytic instrument should be equivalent or better as compared with the UV. This instrument might be used for the air purification and sterilization of the public locations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30