检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石毕凡[1]
出 处:《安徽史学》2008年第6期78-84,共7页Historical Research In Anhui
摘 要:人权为评估一国政治统治的合法性和正当性提供道德上的判断基准。只有当公民不再需要经常用人权与本国政府抗争时,此政府才被认为是合法的。鉴于史学界对国民党统治时期中国人权运动尚缺乏系统剖析,本文以介于国共之间的中间党派为历史考察对象,通过对其主导的人权运动作认真梳理,试图阐明中间党派的宪政思想及其新自由主义人权观的理论意蕴。Human rights are regarded as a moral criterion with which people guess the legitimacy of national government. No other than people needn' t oppose their nation, the government is taken for legitimacy. The article focuses a concrete analysis on the movement of human rights that was presided on the middle parties in the later stage of the Republic of China, and tries to illustrate the constitutionalism of the middle parties and the theoretical logic and philosophical implication of the concept of human rights of new liberalism
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.92.213