机构地区:[1]青岛市立医院呼吸科,山东青岛266011 [2]青岛海慈医院肝胆外科
出 处:《中华急诊医学杂志》2008年第11期1167-1170,共4页Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨内毒素预处理对肝脏缺血-再灌注后肺损伤的影响及机制。方法将48只新两兰大白兔随机分为一般对照组(C一般组)和预处理对照组(C预处理组),缺血-再灌注组(IR组)和预处理再灌注组(LPS+IR组),每组12只。C一般组仪行手术解剖;C预处理组手术解剖前3d分别经腹腔注射0.5、0.5和1.0mg/kg脂多糖(LPS)进行内毒素预处理;IR组夹闭肝门30min,再灌注4h,进行肝脏缺血-再灌注;LPS+IR组行内毒素预处理后再行肝脏缺血.再灌注。检测各组再灌注后4h血清内毒素、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、肺湿干比、灌洗液蛋白含量、组织匀浆丙二醛(MDA)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、肺损伤率及肺泡巨噬细胞核因子-κB(NF-κB)活性的变化。组间比较采用单因数方差分析。结果C一般组和C预处理组各项检测指标差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。LPS+IR组血清TNF-α[(48.31±5.31)pg/ml vs.(56.47±5.09)pg/ml,P〈0.01]、肺湿干比[(4.98±0.33)vs.(5.22±0.31),P=0.03]、灌洗液蛋白含量[(0.68±0.11)g/L vs.(0.76±0.10)g/L,P=0.04]、MDA[(0.86±0.06)nmol/mg vs.(0.93±0.07)nmol/mg,P=0.02]、肺损伤率[(13.4±4.3)%vs.(17.4±4.1)%,P=0.033及肺泡臣噬细胞NF-κB活性[(5.82±1.12)OD/mm^2 vs.(7.40±1.26)OD/mm^2,P〈0.01]明显低于IR组;同时LPS+IR组SOD[(90.30±7.38)U/mg vs.(84.44±7.90)U/mg,P=0.04]明显高于IR组。结论内毒素预处理可以减轻肝脏缺血-再灌注后肺损伤,其机制与降低了血清TNF-α产生及抑制肺泡臣噬细胞中NF-κB活化有关。Objective To investigate the effect of endotoxin pretreatment on lung injury induced by hepatic ischemia reperfusion in rabbits and its mechanism. Method Forty-eight New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into 4 groups with 12 rabbits each group: routine control group, pretreatment control group, ischemia reperfusion group (1R group), and pretreatment repeffusion group( LPS + IR group). Rabbits of routine control group received operative dissector only,and those of pretreatment control group received pretreatment of daily intraabdominal injection of lipopolysaccharide(0.5,0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg, respectively)in the 3 days before operative dissector. Livers of IR group were rendered and ischemic for 30 minutes, and reperfused for up to 4 hours. Rabbits of LPS + IR group received the pretreatment before hepatic ischemia reperfusion. Four hours after reperfusion, serum endotoxin, tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α), wet/dry ratio and broncho-alveolar lavage fluid protein content of lung, mal- ondialdehyde(MDA) and superoxide dismutase(SOD) in lung homogenate,lung injury ratio,and activity of Nuclear factor-κB(NF-κB) in alveolar macrophage were examined. Differences within the groups were analyzed using One way ANOVA. Results Between the two control groups, there were no significant differences in all indexes (P 〉 0.05). The TNF-α (48.31 ± 5.31)pg/ml vs. (56.47 ±5.09)pg/ml, P 〈 0.01] ,wet/dry ratio [ (4.98 ± 0.33) vs. (5.22 ± 0.31), P = 0.03 ], broncho-alveolar lavage fluid protein content [ (0.68 ± 0.11 ) g/L vs. (0.76 ± 0.10)g/L, P = 0.04], MDA[ (0.86 ± 0.06)nmol/mg vs. (0.93 ± 0.07)nmol/mg, P = 0.02] ,lung injury ratio[(13.4±4.3)% vs. (17.4±4.1)%, P = 0.03],and the activity of NF-κB[(5.82± 1.12)OD/mm^2 vs. (7.40 ± 1.26) OD/mm^2, P 〈 0.01 ] in alveolar macrophage of the LPS + IR group were all significantly lower than those of IR group,while the SOD[ (90.30 ±7.38 )U/mg vs. (84.44± 7.90 )U/rag, P
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...