检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]清华大学建筑学院,北京100084
出 处:《新建筑》2008年第5期111-114,共4页New Architecture
摘 要:以美国建筑策划教育为样本,结合我国建筑策划教育的现状进行了比较分析。根据理论研究、高校教育、职业教育、支持系统等多个层面的分析,阐述了中美建筑策划教育体系的差异;并结合第一届国际建筑策划圆桌会议(APRT),对中美两国建筑策划学界交流最新进展情况做了相应的介绍,认为结合当前我国国情的建筑策划教育体系构建的近期重点应该放在以下三个方面:争取各方面有力的支持;向立足于实践的态度和方法学习:根据市场需求为建筑策划教育分层。Based on the sample of architectural programming education of USA, combined with the present situation of Chinese architectural programming education, this paper takes comparative analysis between them. According to the analysis of several aspects which include academic research, college education, professional education and support system, this paper discusses the differences of architectural programming education system of China and United States. According to the authors experiences, this paper introduces some latest information of The 1St International Architectural Programming Round Table ( APRT ). Based on Chinese conditions, the authors consider that the recent works of building our education system should focus on the following three areas: attract all kinds of support from society and organizations, earn the research attitude and methods which are based on practice, categorize different programs for market' s needs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31