检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李飞浪[1] 傅红春[2] 陈万清[1] 李娜[1]
机构地区:[1]广安市人民医院妇产科,四川广安638500 [2]成都市第六人民医院,四川成都610051
出 处:《华西医学》2008年第1期36-37,共2页West China Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:观察利多卡因宫旁阻滞联合宫腔灌注在人流术中镇痛的效果。方法:收集我院2005年1~2月门诊终止妊娠的早孕妇女共94例并分为两组:单纯宫旁阻滞组(简称单纯组)35例,宫旁阻滞联合宫腔灌注(简称联合组)59例。比较两种利多卡因局麻方式的效果。结果:(1)两组的止痛效果无明显差异(P=0.893);(2)联合组对宫颈的松弛作用优于宫旁阻滞(P=0.000);(3)联合组较多病例出现眩晕、耳鸣等副反应。结论:与单纯宫旁阻滞相比,宫旁阻滞联合宫腔灌注并无明显优势。Objective:To compare the influence of paracervical block(PCB)or PCB combined with intrauterine infusion(Ⅱ)with lidocaine on pain relief during suction evacuation for early pregnancy termination.Methods:Ninty-four cases of early pregnant women who want to have suction evacuation for pregnancy termination were studied from January to February in 2005 in the outpatient department in our hospital.They were assigned to the group of PCB(35 cases)and the combined group(59 cases).the outcome of these two lidocaine local anaesthesia was compared.Results:PCB combined with Ⅱ is better than PCB only for the cervical relaxation(P=0.000)There were no significant difference of pain relief and induced abortion syndrome between the two groups.Conclusion:PCB combined with Ⅱ had no obvious advantage than PCB only during suction evacuation for early pregnancy termination.
分 类 号:R169.42[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学] R614
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28