检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《广东金融学院学报》2008年第6期110-116,共7页Journal of Guangdong University of Finance
摘 要:信托财产公示制度的效力模式大致分为公示要件主义和公示对抗主义。两种模式下信托财产公示将产生不同的法律效果。对两种模式下相关决策者承担成本的差异进行微观层面的探析表明,与公示对抗主义相比,在信托财产公示要件主义模式下,决策者需要负担的成本较高,故信托公示对抗主义更具效率;因此,要降低信托当事人承担的挫折成本,赋予公示制度一定的灵活性,使信托财产公示制度得以顺利实施。The trust property public notice system's effectiveness pattern can be divided into the publicity-effective principles and the publicity-antagonistic principles. With the two patterns, the trust property's public notice will have different legal effects, we explore and analyze the difference between the cost borne by the relevant decision makers on the micro-level. The study indicates that with the publicity-antagonistic principles, the cost borne by decision makers is relatively high, so the publicity-effective principles is more efficient for the trust property's public notice; meanwhile, we must reduce the frustration cost borne by the trust parties and offer the system a certain degree of flexibility so that the trust property public notice system can be smoothly implemented.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.72.80