检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广州体育学院休闲与管理系社会体育教研室,广州510075 [2]暨南大学华文学院,广州510630
出 处:《天津体育学院学报》2008年第6期474-477,共4页Journal of Tianjin University of Sport
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(项目编号:06CTY007)
摘 要:通过收集第24-28届奥运会上各国奥运会各项目成绩,依比较优势指数划分各国各等级项目群体,在分析俄罗斯与我国各等级项目群体制约与渗透情况基础上,研究俄罗斯各等级项目群体的国际竞技格局。研究表明,俄罗斯不同性别奥运竞技实力呈现出齐头并进的发展态势,该国比较优势项目群体竞技实力的增长伴随着其有效竞技空间的日益拓展,俄罗斯对我国各等级项目群体制约面广,渗透力强;与此相比,我国对俄罗斯各等级项目群体的制约与渗透显得较为苍白。对俄罗斯比较优势项目群体的制约,已由美国、德国为主导地位的国际竞技格局,转变为以中国、古巴和澳大利亚为主导。俄罗斯比较潜优势项目群体的发展受制于美国和澳大利亚竞技实力的发展。By collecting the results of each sport event of each country from the 24th to the 28th Olympic Games to compare the advantage index of each country for each event group. This paper studies the international competitive sport structure in each event group of Russian based on the analysis of the relations of each sport event group between Russian and China. Different gender Olympic event in Russian presents the development momentum which advances in unison, this comparable superiority is due to the effective athletics space by day-by-day development. Russia restricts broadly the surface to China in various ranks events and has strong penetrability; Compares with this, our country appears weaker to the Russian various ranks project community's constraints and infiltration. To the Russian comparable superiority project community's restriction by the US, Germany for dominant position's international athletics pattern has transformed into China, Cuba and Australia as the leadership. The development of comparative advantages events in Russia were limited by the development of the United States and Australia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117