“规则主义”下使用作品的“合理性”判断  

An Evaluation of the Reasonableness in the Use of Works in the Context of the Doctrine of Rules

作　　者：丁丽瑛[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2008年第6期93-99,121,共8页Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)

基　　金：福建省新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助成果

摘　　要：在"规则主义"立法模式下,使用作品的"合理性"判断具有法律意义和实践价值。即使纳入法律规定的合理使用情形,仍应以"合理性"判断为司法释明内容。合理使用行为包括作品的使用和作品使用后的衍生结果的使用,并且不以非商业性或非营利性使用为是非分水岭。"合理性"判断应当体现公平、正义的价值观,实现利益平衡制度功能,适当地彰显特定作品的"公共物品"属性,并充分考虑作品使用或衍生使用结果的决定性作用。In the context of the Doctrine of Rules, evaluating reasonableness in the use of works has both legal and practical values. Even within the scope of Fair Use stipulated by law, reasonableness evaluation should still be a major content of judicial interpretations. The act of fair use includes the use of works and the utilization of the consequences which follow the former act, and differences must be identified according to whether they are used for commercial or nonprofit purpose. Evaluating reasonableness of this type should reflect the value of equity and justice, and it should be able to balance various interests, properly demonstrate the property of＂Public Goods＂ in certain works, and takes into consideration the decisive role of the use of works and the utilization of consequences.

关 键 词：“规则主义” 合理使用 著作权限制 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]