钱穆对清代学者的比较研究  

Comparitive Study of Qian Mu for Scholars of Qing Dynasty

作　　者：武少民[1] 闫玉环 

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学历史文化学院,吉林长春130024 [2]长春老年大学,吉林长春130061

出　　处：《长春师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2008年第6期48-51,共4页Journal of Changchun Teachers Coliege

摘　　要：钱穆善于用比较的方法评论清代学者,而且运用得娴熟精妙。纵观清代学术史,钱穆最为推崇的是清初诸儒之学,他高度评价黄宗羲的学术成就,充分肯定其在清代学术中的开山地位。在对乾嘉学术的论述中,钱穆一改前人只重视乾嘉汉学的传统,而通过比较的方法,以较大笔墨对乾嘉宋学及乾嘉别派进行分析论述,并认为追求义理的宋学传统一直没有中断。在晚清学术研究中,钱穆反对烦琐的汉学考据,而颂扬主张经世致用的学者。Qian Mu was good at expounding the scholars of Qing Dynasty by the ways of comparison,and he could use the way skillfully and concisely. Looking through the history of Qing Dynasty＇s academics, what Qian Mu had the greatest esteem for was the academics of the confucianists of early Qing. He set a high value on the academic achievements of Huang Zong - xi and confirmed his originator position in the Qing Dynasty＇s academics. In the discussion of Qianjia＇s academics, Qian Mu reformed the predecessors＇ tradition of attaching importance to Qianjia Han academics only into thinking highly of Qianjia Song academics and others by the ways of comparison, and he thought that the Song academics＇ tradition of pursuing philosophie theory was never suspended. In the study of the late Qing academics, Qian Mu opposed the overelaborate textual research of Han academics and praised the scholars who standed for giving full play of history.

关 键 词：钱穆 学术史 比较 清代学者 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]