我国2005年SCI论文质量状况分析报告  

The survey of SCI publication by scientists working in China in 2005

作　　者：李涛[1] 周文胜[1] 朱长飞[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国科学技术大学科学技术处,安徽合肥230026

出　　处：《科学学研究》2008年第A01期11-15,10,共6页Studies in Science of Science

摘　　要：针对我国2005年发表的SCI论文,展开如下调查工作:(1)分别针对我国发表论文数量最多的十个学科,调查在世界IF(Impact Factor,影响因子)排名前10%的期刊(简称TOP10%)上发表的论文数量,及其占同一学科我国SCI论文总量的比例;(2)针对我国在TOP10%期刊上发表的每一篇SCI论文,调查其在2006年的被引次数是否大于或等于期刊IF值(起到"拉升"贡献),并统计具有"拉升贡献"的论文数量,分析其占同一学科我国SCI论文总量的比例;(3)比较了我国与美国在Nature和Science上发表的论文数量及被引次数对期刊IF值起到"拉升"贡献的论文数量。这些调查和分析工作表明我国SCI论文具有数量多,高影响期刊论文少,对IF起到"拉升"作用的论文更少。随后分析了产生上述现象的成因,并提出了一种高质量SCI论文的判断方法。We conducted a survey of peer - reviewed articles published by scientists working in P. R. China in 2005. This survey focused on the publication in the top 10% journals （based on scientific citation impact factor of the journal） and scored the ratio of publication from China relative to the total publications in 10 disciplines. In addition, we investigated the impact of citation numbers published from scientists of China compared to those from foreign scientists and assessed the impact of those papers published from China on the rise in IF values Of the journals. Finally, we compared the number of papers published by scientists in China versus the US in Nature and Science and their impact on citation of the journals. Through this comparative study, we conclude that the high impacted paper from China is rare while the number of publications from China is great. Specifically, few papers published from China gave greater contribution to a rise of impact factor of the journal assessed. Based on our survey and critical analysis, we propose a set of criteria for assessing high - quality paper.

关 键 词：SCI论文 期刊影响因子 被引次数 

分 类 号：G112[文化科学]