SCI检索下环境评价研究的文献计量学评估(1996-2005)  

A Bibliometric Evaluation of Environmental Assessment-related Research in SCI from 1996-2005

作　　者：侯小阁[1,2] 栾胜基[1,2] 杨志芃[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学环境科学与工程学院,北京100871 [2]北京大学深圳研究生院城市人居环境科学与技术重点实验室,广东深圳518055

出　　处：《科学学与科学技术管理》2008年第12期38-43,共6页Science of Science and Management of S.& T.

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(40471052)

摘　　要：通过对由SCI检索出的1996-2005年间所发表的1320篇以环境评价(EA)为主题词的论文文献进行计量学统计分析,探求EA研究现状和发展趋势。分析表明,近年来,EA研究保持着稳定的发展态势和对科学工作者持久的吸引力。环境科学、环境与工程是包括EA相关论文的主要分类目录,论文在不同期刊内呈分散分布,Environmental Management、Ecological Economics、Environmental Monitoring和Assessment等是主要的研究成果发表期刊。国际间合作成为主要的发展趋势,合作发表的论文在数量和影响力两方面都呈增长态势。另外,研究存在着区域间的不平衡,发达国家处于优势地位。不过,研究也显示了环境评价研究在获取学术资源方面有不容乐观的一面。To determine the characteristics of scientific productivity of EA study, a bibliometric analysis of 1,320 EA-related papers in SCI from 1996-2005 was performed. The results indicate that EA-related studies have kept a steady increase since 1996, and EA was a popular topic for scientists. Environmental science and engineering ＆ environmental were the major subject categories of EA-related studies in SCI. The distribution of EA-related papers in journals was discrete. International collaboration was enhanced during the period of 1996-2005 on EA study, and obviously in- ternational co-authored papers were more visible than single-country papers. Developed countries have taken advantage to produce EA-related papers. There were three impeditive factors holding back the EA-Research： lack of continuity, low visibility and the difficulties they faced. Limitations of this bibliometric analysis are the ineompletion of original data and the bias.

关 键 词：文献计量学评估 SCI检索 环境评价 影响因子 引用率 

分 类 号：X3[环境科学与工程—环境工程]