检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄刚[1] 蒋一雅[1] 周燕娟[1] 凌夏君[1] 仇铁锋 周尧 瞿介明[2]
机构地区:[1]江苏大学附属武进医院呼吸科,江苏常州213002 [2]复旦大学附属华东医院呼吸科,上海200040
出 处:《南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)》2008年第11期1457-1460,共4页Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Natural Sciences)
基 金:江苏大学2005年临床医学科技发展基金资助(JLY20050041)
摘 要:目的:研究莫西沙星序贯治疗老年社区获得性肺炎的的临床疗效、安全性。方法:184例轻中度老年社区获得性肺炎患者随机分为3组。A组(对照组)仅予莫西沙星静脉滴注治疗;B组予莫西沙星序贯治疗;C组予头孢呋辛+阿奇霉素常规序贯治疗。结果:①A组、B组和C组痊愈率分别为67.2%(41/61)、65.5%(38/58)和44.7%(31/65),临床有效率分别为93.4%(57/61)、87.9%(51/58)和72.3%(47/65),细菌清除率分别为88.5%(23/26)、85.2%(23/27)和60.0%(15/25);这3个指标中,A、B两组间差异均无统计学意义,B、C两组间差异均有统计学意义;②B组和C组序贯转换时间窗分别为(2.2±1.1)天、(3.1±1.2)天,两组间差异有统计学意义:③A、B、C组不良反应发生率分别为4.9%(3/61)、3.4%(2/58)和13.8%(9/65),A、B两组间差异均无统计学意义,B、C两组间差异均有统计学意义。结论:莫西沙星序贯治疗老年社区获得性肺炎效果确切、安全。Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequential moxifloxacin therapy in the treatment of elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Methods: One hundred and eighty-four elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia were randomly divided into three groups. In group A (control group),moxifloxacin was administered by intravenous infusion,400 mg/250 ml once daily for 7~10 d. In group B (moxifloxacin sequential group) ,moxifloxacin was administered by intravenous infusion 400 mg/250 nd, once daily until to sequential switch time window,followed by oral administration at the same dose. The total treatment duration was also 7-10 days. In group C (combination sequential group),Cefuroxime was administered by intravenous infusion 3.0 g/250 ml,twice daily, with Azithromycin 500 mg/250 ml,onee daily until to sequential switch time window,followed by oral administration of Cefuroxime tablet 250 mg,twice daily and Azithromycin table 500 mg,onee daily. The total treatment duration was also 7-10 d. Results:The overall cure rates and efficacy rates were 67.2 % and 93.4 % in group A,65.5 % and 87.9 % in group B,44.7 % and 72.3% in group C,respectively. The bacterial clearance rates were 88.5 % in group A,85.2 % in group B,60.0 % in group C,respectively. There was no significant difference(P 〉 0.05) between group A and B,and there was significant differenee(P 〈 0.05) between group B and C in the above results. Sequential switch time window were (2.2±1.10)d in group B, (3.09± 1.23)d in group C,respectively (P 〈 0.05). The incidence of adverse drug reactions of three groups were 4. 9%,3.4 % and 13.8 %,respectively. There was no significant difference (P 〉 0.05) between group A and B,and there was significant difference (P 〈 0.05) between group B and C in the above results. Conclusion:Sequential therapy of moxifloxacin in treatment of elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia was effective and safe.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30