检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴曙粤[1] 王艳宁[1] 王利民[1] 黄仕孙[1] 高桂娥[1]
出 处:《中国药房》2008年第35期2721-2723,共3页China Pharmacy
基 金:南宁市科学研究与技术开发计划项目(20040246C)
摘 要:目的:评价3种方案干预治疗新生儿黄疸的经济学效果。方法:120例足月正常新生儿随机分为3组,分别给予退黄外洗液药浴(A组)、口服苯巴比妥+加味茵陈汤(B组)、口服苯巴比妥(C组)治疗6d后评价疗效及不良反应,并进行成本-效果分析。结果:A、B、C组总有效率分别为95.0%、92.5%、82.5%,总成本分别为259.20、131.88、127.38元,成本-效果比分别为272.84、142.57、154.40,A、B组增量成本-效果比分别为1054.56、45.00。A组黄疸出现时间较B、C组推迟约4h,且无不良反应。结论:B组方案在成本-效果比较中较优,但综合治疗比较中,A组方案较优且便于使用。OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost - effectiveness of three therapeutic schemes in the treatments of neonatal jaundice. METHODS: 120 healthy full- term infants were randomly assigned to Group A applied with Jaundice- abating Chinese Herbal Lotion for medicated bath, Group B treated with Phenobarbital po plus Jiawei Yinchen Decoction, and Group C with Phenobarbital po After 6-day treatment, the curative efficacy and adverse drug reactions were evaluated and the cost-effectiveness analyses of the three groups were conducted. RESULTS: The effective rates of A , B and C groups were 95.0%, 92.5% and 82.5% respectively; the total costs were 259.20, 131.88 and 127.38 Yuan respectively, and the cost- effective ratios were 272.84, 142.57, and 154.40 respectively. As compared with Group C, the incremental cost- effective ratios for A and B groups were 1 054.56 and 45.00. Furthermore, the Jaundice appeared 4 hours later in Group A than in B and C groups and there was no adverse reaction in Group A. CONCLUSION: Group B is optimal in cost- effectiveness; however, Group A is superior and easy to use if taking all factors into consideration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.156