检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广西北海市中医院,北海市536000 [2]北海市人民医院,北海市536000
出 处:《中国药房》2008年第35期2725-2726,共2页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:探讨4种方案治疗外阴湿疣的经济学效果。方法:将200例外阴湿疣患者,依就诊先后顺序随机分A(单纯药物)、B(Leep刀联合药物)、C(CO2激光联合药物)、D(微波联合药物)4组,运用药物经济学原理进行成本-效果分析。结果:4组成本分别为264.25、557.82、1065.31、1485.76元,有效率分别为42.1%、83.3%、85.7%、89.7%,B、C、D组相对于A组的增量成本-效果比分别为712.55、1837.29、2566.20。结论:B组的Leep刀联合药物治疗法较理想。OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost- effectiveness of 4 therapeutic schemes for vulva condyloma. METHODS: 228 patients with vulva condyloma were randomly divided into four groups based on their visiting time: Group A (drug therapy alone), Group B (Leep knife plus drug therapy), Group C (CO2-Laser plus drug therapy), Group D (Microwave plus drug therapy) . The cost - effectiveness analysis was conducted on the 4 schemes applying the principle in pharmacoeconomics. RESULTS: The costs of four groups were 264.25, 557.82, 1 065.31 and 1 485.76 Yuan respectively. The effective rates of four groups were 42.1% , 83.3%, 85.7% and 89.7% respectively. Compared with scheme A, the incremental cost - effectiveness ratio in schemes B, C, and D were 712.55, 1 837.29, and 2 566.20 respectively. CONCLUSION: Pharmacoeconomically, Group B (Leep knife plus drug therapy) is the optimal therapy for vulva condyloma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249