检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何学元[1] 马玉梅[1] 李美卉[1] 苏谦[1] 陈冰[1]
机构地区:[1]玉溪市疾病预防控制中心,云南玉溪653100
出 处:《中华卫生杀虫药械》2008年第6期491-492,共2页Chinese Journal of Hygienic Insecticides and Equipments
摘 要:目的探索杀灭德国小蠊的方法,为有效控制德国小蠊危害提供科学依据。方法通过毒饵法和喷洒法杀灭德国小蠊的现场试验,分析不同方法的控制效果。结果毒饵法和喷洒法的近期杀灭效果分别为89.97%和86.44%,中期杀灭效果分别为97.56%和67.69%,远期的杀灭效果分别为100.00%和13.39%。结论毒饵法杀灭德国小蠊优于喷洒法,特别是在产生抗性的地区。Objective To discover an effective method and provide scientific evidence for killing and controlling Blattella germanica. Methods In the first hotel using the method of poison bait, the second hotel using residual spray. Results After 30 days, the killing rates of poison bait was 89. 97%, the killing rates of residual spray was 86. 44% ; they were 97.56% and 67.69% after 60 days; they were 100. 00% and 13.39% after 180 days. Conclusion The method of poison bait is better than residual spray, especially in the places where Blattella germanica have generated resistance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.97