“第四势力”与“舆论监督”之比较  

The Fourth Force" Comparing with "Public Opinion Monitor

作　　者：詹宇昆[1] 肖毅敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京邮电大学人文学院法律系,北京100876

出　　处：《学理论》2008年第22期77-79,共3页Theory Research

摘　　要：首先,本文通过比较西方学者和我国学者对其所下的定义来展开阐述并解释"第四势力"与"舆论监督"的概念。其次,探讨二者的相同之处,如:二者都体现媒体的基本职能,二者都不是绝对的自由,二者都体现公益性,二者都来源于公民权利。第三从法理的层面运用阐述二者的不同点:二者的主体性质不同、二者所包含的内容不同,法律对二者的要求不同,对二者的主要制约方式不同。最后,探求我国"舆论监督"的发展方向。This text passes the more western scholar and our country first the scholar launches to elaborate and explain＂ the fourth influence＂ to the definition that they descend with＂ the public opinion direct＂ its concept.Inquiry into two same places the next in order, such as：Two all body now the basic working talent of the medium, two all is not an absolute freedom, two all body now public welfare, two all come from the citizen fight.The third elaborates two differentias from the level usage of the legal theory：Two corpuses property dissimilarity, two the contents dissimilarity, law that include to two request dissimilarity, to two main check and supervision method dissimilarity.Investigate the development direction of the our country＂ public opinion monitor＂ finally.

关 键 词：第四势力 舆论监督 三权分立 权利 权力 

分 类 号：G21[文化科学—新闻学]