墨经用字现象研究——繁文省文辨  

Research to Word Use of Mojing——Differentiation to Formality and Simplicity

作　　者：张仁明[1] 

机构地区：[1]毕节学院中文系,贵州毕节551700

出　　处：《毕节学院学报（综合版）》2008年第6期82-88,共7页Journal of Bijie University

摘　　要：采用"省文"注释《墨经》用字现象,毕沅、孙诒让已肇其端,至谭戒甫则认为用"繁文、省文"之说,可为治墨书者导一先路,故广泛采用此法。谭注用此法确有不少新解值得重视,但我们在对谭注《墨经》所有的繁文、省文作了分析后认为:所谓的省文、繁文与本原字古音均相同或相近,具有通假的条件之一,可以视为广义的通假字,但通假不能忽视最重要的原则,即社会性原则。谭注省文、繁文说随意在本原字的基础上添加或删减义符后解说字义,且无充分的例证,故不少说解难免主观臆测。而且繁文、省文说不如"通假字"、"古今字""异体字"等术语更能反映古书用字现象。Bi Yuan and Sun Yi started to use simplicity to take notes on Mojing, but Tan Jiehu had an idea of formality and simplicity to lead the scholars managing Mojing, and it was widely adopted. Some new notes by Tan are worth great attention, analyzing them, we think that formality and simplicity have the same and similar ancient pronunciation of the original words with a condition of borrowing words, and they can be regarded as borrowing words. The important principle, as social principle, cannot be neglected. The notes of formality and simplicity by Tan increase or decrease meanings to the original words at will without enough example, some of them are difficult to avoid conjectures. The glossaries of borrowing - word, ancient - present word and different - type word can express more easily than the idea of formality and simplicity.

关 键 词：墨经 谭戒甫 省文 繁文 

分 类 号：H121[语言文字—汉语]