《物权法》适用与“法不溯及既往”原则之例外  

Application of Real Right Law and exceptions for principle of non-retroactivity

作　　者：兰晓为[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,武汉430072

出　　处：《大连海事大学学报（社会科学版）》2008年第6期5-9,共5页Journal of Dalian Maritime University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要："法不溯及既往"原则是中国《立法法》规定的一条宪法性原则,《物权法》适用中理应坚持无疑。然而,《立法法》第84条但书用语又否定了对"法不溯及既往"的绝对适用。基于《物权法》自身特点、对当事人意思自治的尊重以及促进交易的目的,在对《物权法》种种具体规则进行区别分析后,指出《物权法》对"法不溯及既往"原则的例外之处。The principle of non-retroactivity is a constitutional principle regulated by Legislation Law, and should be carried out undoubtedly in the application of Real Right Law. However, the proviso in Article 84 of Legislation Law denies it as a absolute principle. Based on the own characteristics of Real Right Law, party autonomy and the purpose of promoting transaction business, some exceptions of non-retroactivity were pointed out after discriminating analysis on Real Right Law.

关 键 词：法不溯及既往 物权法 物权合同 空间权 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学] D997[政治法律—法学]