上海市流动人口不同聚居形态及其社会融合差异研究  

A Study on the Difference of Social Integration of the Different Floating Population Aggregation Types in Shanghai

作　　者：罗仁朝[1] 王德[1] 

机构地区：[1]同济大学建筑与城市规划学院

出　　处：《城市规划学刊》2008年第6期92-99,共8页Urban Planning Forum

基　　金：科技部"十一五"支撑项目子课题"地区人口迁移动态模拟及安全预警"部分成果(批准号2006BAJ11B02-02)

摘　　要：依据不同城市区位,将流动人口聚居形态分为城郊边缘带与城市郊区两大类型;并从空间特征、服务管理、运作模式等特征将其进一步划分为7个亚类分别考察:即位于城郊边缘带的商贸集散地混居区、再利用的临时住房、流动人口大院、城市老旧小区4类以及位于城市郊区的流动人口与村民的混居区、统一租赁的农村居民点以及新建流动人口公寓3类。在此基础上,选取4个典型案例分别代表城郊边缘带与城市郊区两种类型的聚居区,从居住满意度与社会融合度两个方面,对聚居人群的问卷调查数据进行分析,比较不同聚居类型社会融合特征。分析结果显示,不同聚居形态的居住人群与城市的融合度存在显著差异:即居住于城市郊区聚居区的流动人口对城市的认同感较高,对社区事务也表现出积极的态度与良好的期望,具有更好的社会融合度;而居住于城郊边缘带的流动人口社会融合度则较低。Based on the different locations in the city, this paper divides the residential forms of floating population into 2 types： located in the inner-suburb area and the outside-suburb, and 7 subclasses mixed zones located in traditional business service and industry center, reused temporary houses, floating population yards, old communities （in the inner-suburb area） and the area mix-occupied by floating population and villagers, the whole-rented countryside residential area , the newly built apartments for workers （in the outside-suburb） through characteristics of city position, space form, service management and operation pattem. Then, this paper selects four typical cases representing two different living communities and compares the difference from 2 aspects： the degree of housing satisfaction and the degree of society integration in city by the data collected from the questionnaires. The result shows that the different floating population communities demonstrate remarkable difference in the integration level - floating population living in the inner-suburb community displays much more positive manner and better expectation to the community business and the better degree of social integration.

关 键 词：流动人口 聚居形态 社会融合度 上海 

分 类 号：TU984.114[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]