检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李纬明[1] 许杰华[2] 陈连周[1] 关瑞薇[1] 李春亿[1] 吴克宁[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第一医院,广东广州510080 [2]中山大学附属第三医院,广东广州510080
出 处:《中国热带医学》2009年第1期79-80,共2页China Tropical Medicine
摘 要:目的研究碘131估算法与精确法治疗甲状腺功能亢进(甲亢)的疗效差别,优化医护人员放射防护。方法对拟碘131治疗的甲亢患者根据挂号单双随机分为两组,分别采用估算法和精确法进行碘治疗,进行疗效分析。结果①精确法和估算法两组病人的性别和年龄差异无显著意义。采用独立样本χ2检验两组性别χ2=0.278,P=0.598,年龄χ2≈37.068,P=0.646。②精确法和估算法总体一次治愈率、好转率、复发率分别为79.4%vs70.7%、19.8%vs28%,0.8%vs1.2%,χ2≈2.061,P=0.560,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论精确法与估算法对碘131治疗甲亢的疗效一致,采用估算法进行甲亢碘治疗,减少医护人员治疗时间,优化放射防护。Objective To investigate the differences between estimated method and accurate method in treatment of hyperthyroidism with iodine-131. Methods Patients with hyperthyroidism were randomly divided Estimated Group treated with iodine 131 and Accurate Method Group treated with iodine 131. Effectiveness of the two groups were analyzed. Results There no significant difference in gender and age in two groups (P=0.598) of the gender of the two groups, likelihood ratio was 37.068; (2) cure rate, relief rate and relapse rate of groups after first treatment in accurate and estimated method groups were 79.4% vs 70.7%, 19.8% vs 28%,0.8% vs 1.2%. The likelihood ratio was 2.061(P=0.560). Conclusion No significant difference were observed in the efficiency of accurate and estimated method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.225.72.113