检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《教学与研究》2008年第12期52-58,共7页Teaching and Research
摘 要:本文将考察经济学数学形式主义的两大哲学基础——实证主义和布尔巴基主义,并运用批判实在论等科学哲学及方法论的新成果揭示其封闭系统观的本质和内在缺陷,进而说明基于封闭系统观的数学方法不仅在现实适用性方面存在严重局限,而且并不必然比非数学方法更为严格。经济学有必要摆脱实证主义等封闭系统观哲学的束缚,转向开放系统观和与之相应的方法多元主义。This paper intends to examine the two philosophical bases of mathematical economics formalism, namely, positivism and Bourbakism. It also discusses the nature and internal limitations of the concept of closed system by referring to new findings of scientific philosophy and methodology such as critical realism. Further explanations are offered on why mathematical method based on applicability has limitations, and how it is not necessarily more accurate than non-methematical methods. The paper concludes that economic studies should not be restricted to positivism such as the philosophical concept of closed system, and should turn to an open system and relevant methodology of pluralism.
关 键 词:数学形式主义 哲学基础 实证主义 布尔巴基主义 封闭系统 开放系统
分 类 号:N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学] F0[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.193