检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:房亚明[1]
出 处:《广东工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2008年第4期4-6,共3页Journal of Guangdong University of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:行政垄断是我国赶超型战略及经济体制转轨的副产品,有体制的、政治的、经济的、法律的、管理的等诸方面的原因,涉及国家、公民与社会之间的关系,因此乃是宪政问题。其实质是权力滥用、以权谋利,是违背全面、协调、可持续的科学发展观的要求的。鉴于行政垄断巨大的破坏性,威胁社会公平,耗散政治租金,损害市场秩序,应该通过多方面的制度变革予以破解。经济改革和反行政垄断本质上是宪政转轨的组成部分。Administrative monopolization, as a byproduct of "Catching up with and Surpassing" strategy and economic transformation, is caused by the problems lying in system, politics, economics, laws, government and the like, and interferes the relationships among the state, citizens and society. Therefore it is indeed a matter of constitutionalism. It exists by nature in the form of power abuse for personal gains, and is against the demand for allround, harmonious and sustainable scientific concept of development. Administrative monopolization is enormously destructiveit threats social equity, dissipates political rents, and disrupts market order. All-round institutional reform in politics, economics, laws and society should be undertaken to remove administrative monopolization. Virtually, economic reform and antimonopoly of administration are components of transformation of constitutionalism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.72.3