检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]苏州环境工程有限责任公司,江苏苏州215006 [2]苏州科技学院环境科学与工程系,江苏苏州215011
出 处:《工业用水与废水》2008年第6期55-58,共4页Industrial Water & Wastewater
基 金:"十五"国家重大科技水专项"苏州市城市水环境质量改善技术研究与综合示范"(2003AA601070);苏州市社会发展招标课题"城市河道水系生态修复技术研究"(ZS0304);苏州市社会发展课题"城市河道水质生物修复技术研究及工程示范"(SS0405)
摘 要:试验研究了芦苇和香蒲两种植物,在人工湿地系统处理微污染河水中所起的作用,考察了芦苇和香蒲人工湿地系统对CODMn、总磷、总氮的去除效果。结果表明,香蒲人工湿地系统对CODMn、总磷、总氮的平均去除率分别为37.97%、73.46%、58.53%,而芦苇人工湿地系统的平均去除率分别为28.57%、66.73%、48.32%,香蒲人工湿地系统表现出较好的除污效果,说明采用香蒲的人工湿地系统要优于采用芦苇的人工湿地系统。The effects of Phragmites communis and Typha latifolia in constructed wetland on mlcro-pollutea river water treatment were studied, the removal of CODMn, total phosphorus, total nitrogen by the wetlands planted with the said two kinds of plants respectively were investigated. The results of the test showed that, the average removal rates of CODMn, total phosphorus and total nitrogen by the wetland planted with Typha latifolia were 37.97%, 73.46% and 58.53% respectively. However, the corresponding rates were 28.57%, 66.73% and 48.32% by the wetland planted with Phragmites commumis. It could draw a conclusion that, the constructed wetland planted with Typha latifolia was superior to the wetland planted with Phragmites communis for its better pollution removal efficiency.
分 类 号:X703.1[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.248.54