人格权纠纷案件中损害确定的法律思维  

Lawful thinking on damage definition in the cases of personality dispute

作　　者：王忠诚[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津市高级人民法院法官学院,天津300100

出　　处：《重庆工商大学学报（社会科学版）》2008年第6期106-111,共6页Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：有多少损害被法律所认可,给予何种救济,不仅是一个单纯的关于损害与救济的法律问题,更涉及保护受害人权利与保障公众行为自由的利益平衡。人格损害固有的特点决定了其确定的难度,我国立法的简略使得确定损害的作业更多地由法院来完成。影响法官决定的因素,既有实践执行层面的现实桎梏,也有理念思维方面的认识偏差。损害因人而异,救济也应因人而异,必须以此为基础确立损害与救济权衡的法律思维。How many damages are recognized by laws and what kind of relief is given to the victim？ This is not only a pure lawful issue about damage and relief but also interest balance between protection of victim＇s right and protection of masses＇ behavioral freedom. Thecharacteristics of personality damage determine the difficulty in defining the damage. China＇s legislation about damage is brief, which makes definition of the damage be done by the court. The factors which affect the judge to make decision have been restricted by practice and deviated in the judge＇s thinking. The damage varies from person to person, as a result, relief varies from person to person. Lawful thinking about damage and relief must be set up based on this.

关 键 词：人格权 损害 法律思维 救济 侵权责任 

分 类 号：D924.31[政治法律—刑法学]