检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王永祥[1]
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学外国语学院,江苏南京210097
出 处:《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2008年第6期66-72,共7页Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
摘 要:近年来,许多学者对索绪尔的任意性原则提出了挑战,并以语言符号的可论证性或象似性特征为依据,对任意性特征进行否定。根据符号、能指和所指的关系提出语言产生的模式,并针对"可论证"说和"象似"说对任意性原则提出的挑战进行商榷和反驳。我们的结论是:任意性是语言符号不可动摇的原则;可论证性或象似性只能是置于任意性这一根本原则之下的补充,而不可能替代任意性。During the recent years, many scholars have aired challenging viewpoints concerning the principle of arbitrariness from the perspective of motivation or iconicity and have even made attempts to negate the arbitrariness of the linguistic sign. The author of the present paper manages to construct a language production model on the basis of the relationship between sign, signifier and signified, and presents his views concerning the theories of "motivation" and "iconicity". The conclusion is that arbitrariness is an unbreakable principle of the linguistic sign ; motivation or iconicity can be a mere supplement to the understanding of language under the fundamental principle of arbitrariness instead of a substitute for arbitrariness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200