检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]复旦大学经济系
出 处:《经济学家》1998年第1期4-9,共6页Economist
摘 要:在我国目前的转型经济研究中,新制度经济学的分析范式逐渐成为不可替代的主流参照体系。在对新制度经济学的研究当中,我们发现其中蕴含着某些已久违了的马克思主义的元素,细细一想,这并不奇怪,马克思主义经济学的许多内容研究的正是制度、制度结构及其作用机制。因此,在具有可比性的基础上,本文从制度结构、制度的经济学考察和方法论几个方面,对新制度经济学(含交易费用经济学、产权经济学、制度变迁理论、公共选择理论)与马克思主义经济学作了初步的比较研究。Abstract In the study of China's present transformation economy, the analytical patterns are gradually becoming the principal reference system which can not be substituted by others. In the study of neo-institutional economics, we find that there are certain Marxist elements missed for long in it. Thinking over it carefully it is not strange since the researches of many Marxist economic contents are rightly the economic institutions, institutional structures and their functioning mechanisms. Therefore, this paper makes a first-step comparative study on a comparable basis on neo-institutional economics with Marxist economics from several fields of institutioal structures, the investigation and its methodology, including the economics of exchange costs, property right economics, the theory of institutional changes and the theory of public option.
分 类 号:F0-0[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222