检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄建平[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100038
出 处:《吉林公安高等专科学校学报》2008年第6期60-64,共5页Journal of Jilin Public Secunity Academy
基 金:2007年度中国人民公安大学校级科研项目<法医DNA证据的诉讼法视野研究>的阶段性成果。项目编号:07SK014。
摘 要:DNA证据在刑事司法程序中有着独特的自身价值,但这并不意味着DNA证据就是完美无缺的"证据之王"。在当前我国的刑事司法领域中,关于DNA的鉴定和证据适用等方面还存在着诸多的问题。因此,我国应在DNA证据采信等环节上建立和完善相应规则,克服对DNA证据的盲目轻信。DNA evidence is one of the typical scientific evidence in criminal proceedings. The current research on DNA evidence is mainly in natural sciences .But as an identification conclusion, problems of DNA evidence in the criminal judicial process and the issues involved are precisely need to be studied and discussed. DNA evidence has the priority of objectivity, scientific and reliable, but it is not mean that DNA evidence is the "King of the evidence." In the field of criminal process, there are still many problems of DNA evidence. As a result, our country must not only improve the relevant legislation and regulatory mechanisms, but also establish appropriate standards to make the DNA evidence more reliable and put an end to the blind trust of the DNA identification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.116