实施气管切开病人2种气道湿化方法的效果比较  

Comparison of the Effect of Two Airway Humidity Therapy after Tracheotomy

作　　者：王凤静[1] 李淑芝[1] 张雪垠[1] 

机构地区：[1]内蒙古民族大学附属医院,内蒙古通辽028000

出　　处：《内蒙古民族大学学报（自然科学版）》2008年第6期700-701,共2页Journal of Inner Mongolia Minzu University：Natural Sciences

摘　　要：目的:比较气管切开后气管内持续滴入湿化法与间断滴入湿化法湿化气道的效果.方法:将52例气管切开患者分成2组,甲组采用持续滴入湿化法,乙组采用间断滴入湿化法.结果:湿化24h后,甲组湿化满意率为86.2%,乙组为52.17%,湿化不足者乙组为8.7%,甲组为0.001%.结论:持续滴入湿化效果满意,肺部感染发生率低,不易形成痰栓,且能减轻护理工作量,值得临床推广应用.Objective： To compare the effect of two airway humidity therapy with continuous and discontinuous endotracheal instillation after tracheotomy. Methods：52 patients after tracheotomy were divided into two groups：patients in group A underwent continuous endotracheal instillation and the ones in group B underwent discontinuous endotraeheal instillation. Results： The effective rate for group A and B was 86.2% and 52.17% respectively. The incidence of insufficient humidification for group A and B was 0.001% and 8.7% separately. Conclusion： Continuous endotracheal instillation possesses the advantages of satisfactory effect, low incidence of pulmonary infection and of phlegm plug. It is worth popularizing in clinical activity.

关 键 词：气管切开 气道湿化 护理 

分 类 号：R473[医药卫生—护理学]