检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京中医药大学附属东直门医院普外科,100700
出 处:《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》2008年第3期43-45,共3页Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition)
摘 要:目的通过对腹膜前间隙补片疝修补术和疝环填充式无张力疝修补术两种术式及疗效的对比,总结出两种手术方法优缺点。方法采用随机分组方法,将患者分为2组,每组24例,分别施行腹膜前间隙补片疝修补术和疝环填充式无张力疝修补术,观察两组之间疗效差别。结果腹膜前间隙补片疝修补术组在手术时间、局部异物感、伤口麻木感等方面优于疝环填充式无张力疝修补术组。结论腹膜前间隙补片疝修补术能更好地缩短手术时间,减少术后不适。Objective To compare the operation type and effect of Stoppa operation and mesh-plug tension-flee hernioplasty in treatment of inguinal hernia. Methods 48 patients with inguinal hernia were randomly divided into 2 groups equally to receive Stoppa operation and mesh-plug tension-free hernioplasty respectively, and the therapeutic effects of 2 groups were observed at the same time. Results Stoppa operation has advantages over mesh-plug tension-free hernioplasty in shortening operative time, reducing foreign body sensation and numbness in wounds. Conclusions Stoppa operation can shorten the operation time and reduce postoperative discomfort.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.182.56