检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》2008年第3期50-51,共2页Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition)
摘 要:目的探讨无张力疝修补术后切口感染的防治。方法回顾性分析同期腹股沟疝无张力修补与传统疝修补术后切口感染率并进行比较。结果无张力疝修补的术后切口感染率为0.40%,传统疝修补术后切口感染率为0.50%。两种术式术后切口感染率相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹股沟疝无张力修补虽然有异体材料植入,但并不增加术后切口感染机率,严格遵守无菌手术原则才是预防术后切口感染的关键。Objective To explore the prevention and cure of postoperative infection of tension-free hernia Repair. Methods Retrospective analysis of the postoperative infection rate of inguinal hernia with tension-free repair and traditional method during the same period. Results the postoperative infection rate of tension-free hernia repair is 0.40%, and the postoperative infection rate of the hernia repair with traditional method is 0.50%. There is no significant difference between them. Conclusions Though there are variant materials implanted in body for inguinal hernia with tension-free repair, there is no more infection probability. To abide the principle of aseptic operation strictly is the key point of preventing postoperative infection of ineisional wound.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.184.40