国内外包装合理性评价指标体系比较研究  

Comparative Study of Packaging Rationality Evaluation System

作　　者：谢明辉[1,2] 李丽[2] 朱雪梅[2] 黄泽春[2] 孙体昌[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京科技大学,北京100082 [2]中国环境科学研究院固体废物污染控制技术研究所,北京100012

出　　处：《包装工程》2009年第1期194-198,共5页Packaging Engineering

基　　金：国家“十一五”科技支撑计划重大项目“清洁生产与循环经济的关键技术与示范研究”课题(2006BACO2A13)

摘　　要：通过对欧盟、美国、韩国、日本等国外发达国家和地区的包装合理性评价指标体系的研究,比较了各国包装合理性评价指标体系的特点。欧美的包装评价指标体系技术框架系统全面,评价方式科学合理;而亚洲的包装评价指标体系可操作性强,限制对象明确。但这些评级体系也有其不足:评价体系偏重于环境因素而削弱了功能因素和成本因素的重要性;评价体系过于偏重产品的某一阶段而非全生命周期过程;评价内容过于量化等。在此基础上,针对我国存在商品过度包装的现状,对我国包装合理性评价指标体系的建立提出建议。Reasonable evaluation of packaging in developed countries such as EU, the United States, South Korea and Japan were introduced and analyzed. American and European packaging evaluation index system was comprehensive, which is the scientific and reasonable evaluation method; while Asian packaging evaluation index system was with high maneuverability and clear restrictions target. Still there were also some disadvantages in these systems. Evaluation System attached more importance to the environmental factors than to the functional factors and the cost factors, and too biased towards a certain stage of the process rather than the entire life cycle. The evaluation content was too quantitative. On the basis of over- packaging phenomena in our country, some suggestions on rationality evaluation of packaging in our Country were put forward.

关 键 词：包装 合理性评价 指标体系 

分 类 号：TB482[一般工业技术—包装工程]