检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘琴[1] 汪洋[1] 王宏[1] 黄炳花[1] 黄睿睿[1] 曾缓[1]
出 处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2009年第1期48-51,共4页Chinese Mental Health Journal
基 金:国家自然科学基金(30671792)
摘 要:目的:分析三峡后靠移民的心理健康问题及其影响因素。方法:采用整群随机抽样,应用自编的基本情况调查问卷、症状自评量表(SCL-90)、团体用心理社会应激调查表及社会支持评定量表对319名三峡后靠移民和327名当地居民进行问卷调查。结果:(1)后靠移民SCL-90总分及躯体化、人际关系敏感、抑郁、敌对和偏执因子分均高于当地居民[(123.5±37.0)vs.(117.4±26.0),(1.8±0.7)vs.(1.7±0.7),(1.3±0.4)vs.(1.2±0.3),(1.4±0.6)vs.(1.3±0.4),(1.3±0.4)vs.(1.2±0.3),(1.2±0.4)vs.(1.1±0.3);P=0.016,0.038,0.028,0.024,0.001,0.012];(2)移民的应激总分、生活事件得分、消极情绪体验得分和消极应对得分均高于当地居民[(36.3±19.2)vs.(29.9±17.1),(2.9±2.0)vs.(2.4±1.8),(2.7±2.6)vs.(2.0±2.2),(2.42.2)vs.(1.92.0);均P<0.01];(3)多重线性逐步回归分析,进入模型的变量包括应激总分、主观经济状况、生活事件、社会支持总分和健康状况,后靠移民心理健康的主要相关因素是应激总分、主观经济状况、生活事件、社会支持总分和健康状况(β=0.198,0.152,0.256,-0.151,0.117)。结论:三峡后靠移民的心理健康状况比当地居民差,应针对影响后靠移民心理健康的因素,如应激总分、主观经济状况、生活事件、社会支持总分和健康状况等采取相应措施,提高移民心理健康水平。Objectives: To study the mental health problems of migrants resettled nearby the Three Gorges Reservoir area and their related factors, so as to provide evidence for policy making. Methods: A total of 319 migrants and 327 local residents were selected by a cluster sampling method and completed a self-made questionnaire for general status and completed three mental scales including the Symptom Checklist 90 ( SCL-90 ) , Psyehosocial Stress Survey for Groups ( PSSG ) and Social Support Rating Scale ( SSRS ) . Results : ( 1 ) The total scores and five factor scores of SCL- 90 including somatization, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, hostility and paranoid ideation in the migrants were significantly higher than that in the local residents [ (123.5 ± 37.0 ) vs. ( 117.4 ± 26.0 ), ( 1.8 ± 0. 7 ) vs. (1.7±0.7), (1.3±0.4) vs. (1.2±0.3), (1.4±0.6) vs. (1.3±0.4), (1.3±0.4) vs. (1.2±0.3), (1.2 ± 0. 4 ) vs. ( 1.1 ± 0. 3 ), respectively ; all P 〈 0.05 ] . ( 2 ) PSSG total score and scores of life event, negative emotion and negative coping in mgrants were significantly higher than that in local residents [ ( 36. 3 ± 19. 2 ) vs. ( 29.9 ± 17.1), (2.9±2.0) vs. (2.4±1.8), (2.7 ±2.6) vs. (2.0±2.2), (2.42.2) vs. (1.92.0); all P〈0.01] . ( 3 ) Multiple linearity stepwise regression analysis revealed that main factors relevant to migrants'mental health included total stress, economic status, life events, social support and health status ( β= 0. 198, 0. 152, 0. 256, -0. 151 and 0. 117, respectively) . Conclusion: In general, migrants resettled nearby the reservoir area have worse mental health than their local counterparts. Measures aiming to promote mental health care for the migrants should be devel- oped based on the main factors influencing on their mental health including total stress, economic status, life events, social support and health status.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28