检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2009年第1期85-89,共5页Journal of Northwest University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:为了深入分析欧盟在民商事判决承认与执行中对公共秩序规则采取的态度,应用案例分析的方法,研究了欧共体法院对该规则进行解释的克霍姆巴赫案,认为欧共体法院和欧盟各成员国共同确定公共秩序的内容。欧共体法院采用目的解释的原则和严格解释的方法,确定须有对《欧洲人权公约》的违反达到了不可接受的程度才可援引公共秩序规则,各成员国法院在该界限范围内确定公共秩序的内容。After a throughout analysis of the judgment of case Krombach v. Bamberski given by the Court of Justice of European Communities (hereinafter the ECJ) ,it is argued that the ECJ and the Member States share the competence to define the meaning of public policy. Under the guideline of a teleological interpretative approach, the ECJ sets a strictly narrow outer limit of the public policy, i.e. an unacceptable breach of the fundamental human rights guaranteed by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Within the ambit, the Member States are free to decide the content of public policy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.124