检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省深圳市中医院药剂科,广东深圳518033 [2]广东省佛山市中医院药剂科,广东佛山528000
出 处:《中国医药导报》2009年第2期74-75,共2页China Medical Herald
摘 要:目的:观察研制的排石颗粒对泌尿系统结石的排除效果。方法:根据中医中药传统理论组方,多年研制排石颗粒,选择临床确诊为泌尿系统结石(肾结石、输尿管结石、膀胱结石、多部位结石)的患者120例,随机平分为三组,每组40例,分别用排石颗粒(观察组)和排石饮液(中药对照组)及友来特(西药对照组)治疗,以《中药新药临床研究指导原则》为标准进行对比观察。结果:观察组治疗泌尿系统结石的总有效率为85.0%,对照组中、西药分别为80.0%和95.0%。排石颗粒比排石饮液稍好(P<0.05)。结论:排石颗粒对泌尿系统结石有排除作用,但没有西药友来特明显(P<0.01)。Objective: To observe the removing effect for the stones of the urinary tract of Lithagogue Powder studied and prepared by ourselves. Methods: According to the theoretical prescription of traditional Chinese medicine, we studied and prepared the Lithagogue Powder. 120 patients who were confirmed of urinary tract calculi in the kidneys, ureters, bladder or multiple sites were randomly divided into three groups, with 40 patients in each group, the patients in three groups were treated with Lithagogue Powder (observation group), Lithagogue Liquid (TCM control group) and Uralyt-u (western medicine control group) respectively. The comparison and observation were done under the instruction of the Instruction and Princi- ples for the clinical research of new drugs of traditional Chinese medicine. Results: The general effective rate of the obser- vation, TCM control and Western medicine group were 85.0%, 80.0% and 95.0% respectively. The observation group was better than the TCM control group (/~〈0.05). Conclusion: The Lithagogue Powder shows removing function for the urinary tract calculi, but not more effective than the Western medicine Uralyt-u (P〈0.01).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.19.237.16