小学生建设性思考量表的初步编制  

Development of A Constuctive Thinking Scale for Pupils

作　　者：刘俊升[1,2] 周颖[3] 

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学应用心理学系,上海200234 [2]上海师范大学儿童发展与家庭研究中心,上海200234 [3]中国浦东干部学院科研部

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2008年第6期615-617,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：上海市教育委员会科研创新项目(CW0810);上海高校选拔培养优秀青年教师科研专项基金(RE707);上海市教育委员会重点学科项目(J50403)的资助

摘　　要：目的:编制适合中国小学生的建设性思考量表,并检验其信效度。方法:在对有关研究资料的检索和分析基础上,确定量表的理论框架,建立条目库,经专家论证和小样本调查的结果,对条目进行修改,形成测试版本,并对302名小学生进行测试。结果:①项目分析剔除了三道鉴别力较低的题目,剩余与总分之间的积距相关在0.41-0.66之间;②全量表的内部一致性α系数为0.88,五个分量表的内部一致性α系数在0.66-0.75之间,重测信度为0.83;③探索性因素分析共抽取出五个因素,分别命名为消极情绪应对、挫折应对、人际怀疑、二分法思考、迷信思考,涵盖23个条目,可解释53.13%的变异,各条目的负荷范围在0.36至0.75之间,效标关联效度良好。结论:小学生建设性思考量表具有较好的信度和效度,可用于评估中国小学生建设性思考。Objective： To develop a Constructive Thinking Scale for Chinese pupils. Methods： Data were collected from a sample of 302 primary school pupils tested with the Constructive Thinking Scale. Results： ①Item analysis showed that the Constructive Thinking Scale had satisfactory item discrimination; ②The Constructive Thinking Scale had a satisfactory reliability with a 0.83 test-retest reliability, and the Cronbach’s α was 0.88; ③The result of EFA had five factors, and the range of factor loading was between 0.36 and 0.75. The final revised questionnaire included 23 items, which could explain 53.13% of the total variances. The scale had an ideal criterion validity. Conclusion： The Constructive Thinking Scale for pupils has ideal reliability and validity, and can be used in assessing Chinese pupils’ constructive thinking .

关 键 词：心理测量 建设性思考 小学生 信度 效度 探索性因素分析(EFA) 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]