检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐红霞[1] 阎晓辉[1] 于燕[1] 王磊[1] 薛艳斌[1]
出 处:《中国医药》2009年第1期53-54,共2页China Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨共振吸脂术的操作要点、疗效和安全性。方法208例女性采用完全随机法分为共振组和手动组,各104例,均行治疗区域肿胀浸润麻醉,其中共振组利用肿胀麻醉下共振吸脂技术进行局部脂肪抽吸,手动组进行传统的手动式负压吸脂,比较2组手术后疗效及并发症。结果共振组脂肪抽吸量400~5500ml,平均纯脂肪量占总吸出量的(75.58±12.43)%,失血量30~120ml,患者总满意度95.19%,并发症发生率4.81%。手动组抽吸量260~3800ml,平均纯脂肪量占总吸出量的百分比为(61.25±19.69)%,失血量50~200ml,患者满意率为85.58%,并发症发生率15.38%。2组患者各指标间差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论共振吸脂术能有效地乳化脂肪,减少出血,安全性较高,疗效较好。Objective To explore the effect and safety of resonance liposuction. Methods Resonance liposuction was applied with swelling anesthesia, and was compared with the method of traditional negative pressure liposuction. Effect and complications of the surgery were observed. Results In resonance liposuction group, volume of the sucked fat was 400 to 5500 ml, and the pure fat was (75.58±12.43 ) % of the total sucked tissue. Blood lost was 30 to 120 ml. Satisfaction rate was 95.19%. 4.81% patients showed slight complications. For the traditional negative pressure liposuction group, volume of the sucked fat was 260 to 3800 ml, and the pure fat was ( 61.25 ± 19.69) % of the total sucked tissue. Blood lost was 50 to 200 ml. Satisfaction rate was 85.58%. 15.38% patients showed complications with different levels. Those observing targets between the two groups showed statistical difference (P 〈 0.01 or P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Resonance liposuction can effectively emulsify fat, reduce blood loss, and provide better safety and effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7