试析20世纪30年代有关中国古代经济方法论的歧见  

An Analysis of the Different Views on the Methodology of Chinese Ancient Economy in the 1930s

作　　者：钟祥财[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海社会科学院经济研究所研究员,上海200020

出　　处：《社会科学》2009年第1期139-149,共11页Journal of Social Sciences

摘　　要：20世纪30年代中期,学术界出现了关于中国古代经济方法论的歧见。马寅初在当时对中国古代经济方法论的定位是符合历史事实的,但他据此提出的全体主义方法和统制经济主张则值得商榷;唐庆增对中国古代经济方法论的判断不无偏颇之处,但他坚持的个人主义方法却有相当的理论深度。分析反思这一歧见,不仅对研究中国经济思想的现代演进有重要价值,而且对选择中国未来经济走向有警示意义。In the middle of the 1930s,there were different views on the methodology of Chinese ancient economy.Ma Yinchu's argument of methodology was reasonable,but his holism methodology and idea of controlled economy is questionable. Tang Qingzeng's thought is partial,however,his individualism is of much theoretical depth.So the analysis and rethinking of those different thoughts not only have important value for study of modern development of Chinese economic thought,but also have warning significance for choosing economic trend in the future.

关 键 词：20世纪30年代 经济方法论 歧见 

分 类 号：F092[经济管理—政治经济学]