检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李洁[1]
出 处:《国家检察官学院学报》2009年第1期108-116,共9页Journal of National Prosecutors College
摘 要:日本刑事判例制度不仅对刑事司法发挥重大作用而且还影响立法,这种判例制度对于解决立法滞后与现实活发之间的矛盾发挥着重大作用,相应地,司法中以判例实质地创制法规范等做法也可能一定程度上消解罪刑法定原则。日本的刑事判例制度给我国目前的有权司法解释模式提供了启示,如重视法律的权威性等。应当借鉴该判例制度构建我国的"一元个体判决式"的刑法解释模式。Japanese criminal precedent system influences not only great the criminal justice but also the legislation, and such a system has exeaed significant function in moderating the inconsistency between legislative delay and actual activity. Accordingly, law - making by the precedent in judicature is likely to violate the principle of legally prescribed punishment to a certain extent. Japanese criminal precedent system provides approaches for Chinese present pattern of entitled judicial interpretation, for exam- ple, attaching importance to the authority of law. China should establish the criminal law interpretation mode of " unitary individual judgment" using Japanese precedent system for reference.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145