临床路径在大容量肺灌洗治疗尘肺中的研究  

Study for the treatment of pneumoconiosis by large volume lung lavage through clinical pathway

作　　者：胡晓英[1] 廖梅兰[1] 张玉兰[1] 袁艳珍[1] 刘江红[1] 杨蓉美[1] 

机构地区：[1]江西省胸科医院护理部,江西南昌330006

出　　处：《护士进修杂志》2009年第2期101-103,共3页Journal of Nurses Training

基　　金：江西省卫生厅科技计划立项课题(编号:20071147)

摘　　要：目的研究临床路径(CP)应用于大容量肺灌洗治疗尘肺患者实施效果。方法将130例大容量肺灌洗治疗尘肺患者按住院顺序随机分为实验组和对照组,对照组65例实施传统治疗和护理,实验组65例实施CP,将两组的治疗、护理效果进行对比。结果两组灌洗后患者临床症状及肺功能均有极显著差异。住院费用:实验组平均每人8803.66±812.02元,对照组平均每人10534.69±1035.43元,两组比较差异有极显著意义。住院天数:实验组平均每人9.74±1.32 d,对照组平均每人12.98±2.37 d,两组比较有极显著差异。结论CP应用于大容量肺灌洗治疗尘肺能提高医疗护理质量,降低住院费用,缩短住院时间,在临床实践中切实可行。Objective To analyze the influence of the clinical pathway for the treatment of Pneumoconiosis by large volume lung iavage. Method 130 pneumoconiosis patients with large volume lung lavage treatment were divided into two groups, the control group has 65 examples adopting traditional treatment and nursing. The treatment group also has 65 examples adopting clinical pathway. The result of the two group treatment and nursing was observed and compared. Result There was significant difference between the two group in clinical symptom and lung function the average cost is 8803.66±812.02 Yuan in treatment group and 10534.69 ± 1035.43 Yuan in control group. There is significant difference between the groups The average days stay in hospital in treatment group is 9.74± 1.32 days and 12.98±2.37 days in control group. There is also significant difference between the groups. Conclusion Clinical pathways can be used for pneumoconiosis treatment by large votume lung lavage, and can improve the treatment and nursing quality, reduce medical cost, reducing hospitalization days. It＇s practical and feasible.

关 键 词：临床路径 尘肺 大容量肺灌洗 

分 类 号：R472[医药卫生—护理学]