《马氏文通》果真主张“字有定类”吗?——评汉语语法学史上延续60多年的一种观点  

Is "Word is of Definite Category" Really Proposed in Ma's Grammar(Ma Shi Wen Tong)?

作　　者：邵霭吉[1] 

机构地区：[1]盐城师范学院文学院,江苏盐城224002

出　　处：《盐城师范学院学报（人文社会科学版）》2008年第6期70-75,共6页Journal of Yancheng Teachers University（Humanities & Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：江苏省哲学社会科学研究"十五"规划基金项目(04YYB012)

摘　　要：《马氏文通》是主张"字无定类"的。但是近60年来一直有学者认为《马氏文通》也主张"字有定类",或者说《马氏文通》既主张"字无定类"又主张"字有定类"。其实,《马氏文通》中只有"字无定类"说,而根本没有"字有定类"说。《马氏文通》既然主张"字无定类",它就不可能再主张"字有定类"。Ma＇s Grammar （Ma Shi Wen Tong） asserts that ＂word is of no definite category＂. But in recent sixty years, several scholars claim that Ma＇s Grammar （Ma Shi Wen Tong） asserts that ＂word is of definite category＂ or both ＂word is of definite category＂ and ＂word is of no definite category＂. In fact, Ma＇s Grammar （Ma Shi Wen Tong） only asserts that ＂word is of no definite category＂; never ＂word is of definite category＂. There exists no possibility that such a contradictory assertion is proposed in Ma＇s Grammar （Ma Shi Wen Tong）.

关 键 词：《马氏文通》 字类 字有定类 

分 类 号：H04[语言文字—语言学]