检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江大学电气工程学院,浙江杭州310027 [2]浙江电力调度通信中心,浙江杭州310007 [3]浙江省电力试验研究院,浙江杭州310014 [4]加州独立系统调度机构,美国加利福尼亚95630
出 处:《浙江大学学报(工学版)》2009年第1期159-165,共7页Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science
基 金:国家“十一五”科技支撑计划资助项目(2006BAA02121)
摘 要:将一种新的可靠性分析方法——GO法引入到电力系统领域中,探讨了该方法在特高压直流输电系统可靠性分析中的应用.研究表明,基于状态概率公式推导的方法可以对系统进行较为准确的定量分析,但当系统中包含有共有信号时分析将变得十分复杂,具体表现为解析表达式的推导十分困难.针对该问题,探讨了一种新的定量计算方法,该方法基于状态组合方法展开,结合所开发的GO程序,可十分方便快捷地对系统进行精确的定量与定性分析.基于故障树法对同一系统的分析结果验证了GO法在特高压直流输电系统可靠性分析中的可用性与正确性.通过对两种方法特点的比较,阐明了GO法的特点和优势.A new reliability assessment method, called the GO methodology, was introduced to the field of power system, and the reliability assessment of ultra high voltage direct current (UHVDC) system was conducted using the method. Results show that the system can be analyzed quantitatively and accurately based on the derivation of status probability formula. The method may become very complicated when the system contains shared signals, and it mainly displayed as the difficulty of derivation of analytical expressions. Then a new quantitative calculation method was discussed. The method was based on the idea of state combination. Both the qualitative and quantitative analysis can be conveniently conducted combined with the developed GO software. The fault tree analysis method was used to analyze the same system, and the analysis results completely accorded with the GO methodology. The comparison between the two methods shows that the GO methodology outperforms the fault tree analysis method in many aspects.
分 类 号:TM732[电气工程—电力系统及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15