国际关系是关系：对存在的反思与重构  

International Relations is Relationtivity:Rethinking and Reconstructing the Ontology of IR

作　　者：宣兴章[1] 

机构地区：[1]中共中央党校国际战略研究所2006级博士研究生,北京100091

出　　处：《世界经济与政治》2009年第1期17-26,共10页World Economics and Politics

摘　　要：西方主流国际关系理论实际上不是在探讨国家之间的关系,而是在探讨立法者为国家和人性预定法则,国家间关系是因之而派生的。这是古希腊自然信仰、基督教哲学以及近代自然法传统的产物。由于当代国际关系理论隐藏了这个立法者,导致了国际关系的本体论处于分裂状态,因而人性、国家性质与国际关系性质的关联是割裂的。只有将立法者彻底除去,国际关系作为一种存在才可以恢复到其本来面目。也就是说,国际关系与国家的性质只能在关系中确定,国际关系是进程与演化、自组织与他组织相互作用的结果。作者认为,将国际关系简化为关系,将关系作为国际关系的本体论,这样才能沟通中国古典思想与西方现代思想,进而构建中国国际关系理论。What the western mainstream IR theory has been discussing is actually not the relationship among nation states, but the rules destined by ‘the lawmaker’ for the state of anarchy, nation states and humanity. The relationship among states is derived from these rules,which is also the legacy of ancient Grecian natural worship, Christian philosophy and the natural law of the Modern Age. Due to the fact that ‘the lawmaker’ has been long concealed in contemporary IR theory, the ontology of IR is therefore fragmentized and the correlation among humanity, nature of states and nature of IR is consequently cracked. Only by wiping off ‘the lawmaker’ in IR theory can the ontology of IR revert to its true state, that is, the relationtivity. In other words, the relationship among nation states and the nature of states can only be ascertained through mutual and multilateral reactions. IR is an evolutive process of interactions between self-organization and hetero-organization. Taking the relationtivity as the ontology of IR can bridge the gap between Chinese classical thoughts and the contemporary western philosophies, and moreover further construct the matrix of Chinese school of IR.

关 键 词：无政府状态 存在 本体论 关系性 中国国际关系理论 

分 类 号：D80[政治法律—政治学]