“富矿”抑或“归宿”——评乔治·瑞泽尔眼中的后现代社会理论世界  

Bonanza or End-result:Remark on the World of the Theories of Post-modernism from the Eyes of George Ritzer's

作　　者：袁同成[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海大学社会学系,上海宝山200444

出　　处：《重庆三峡学院学报》2009年第1期68-70,142,共4页Journal of Chongqing Three Gorges University

摘　　要：在通览乔治?瑞泽尔《后现代社会理论》一书的基础上,本文对后现代社会理论的几个主要代表人物的观点进行了梳理与归纳,认为从福柯的权力"微观物理学"分析到布希亚的"符码——消费社会"理论再至德里达的"解构"策略无不闪耀着创新的智慧之光,但是他们有"解构"而无"建构"的逻辑和"悲观主义"、"虚无主义"的论调也确实难以给现实的社会生活提供可信的路径和依托。故此,作者认为后现代社会理论只是社会理论难能可贵的"富矿",而非"归宿",只是新社会理论的"起点"而非"终点"。Based on the thorough and careful reading of the book titled The Theories of Post-modernism written by Ritzer,G, the article sums up the main ideas of the key theorists working on post-modernism and claims that there may lie many shining creative wisdom among Foucault＇s theory about the micro-physics of power ,Baudrillard＇s theory of code and the strategy of Derrida＇ s deconstruction .However, the logic of deconstruction without construction and the tone of nihilism along with pessimism can hardly give any credible access to the success of real social life .So the author believes that the theories of Post-modernism can be the valuable bonanza but can not be the end-result of us. We can surely say that it＇s the new starting-point but not the terminal point of new social theory.

关 键 词：后现代社会理论 评读 富矿 归宿 

分 类 号：B151[哲学宗教—世界哲学]