取得时效制度存废论——兼评取得时效制度在我国物权法中的缺失与构建  

Maintenance or Discard on Acquisitive Prescription System:Also on the Missing and Construction of Acquisitive Prescription in Property Law in China

作　　者：沈永敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]福建财会管理干部学院,福建福州350001

出　　处：《福建行政学院学报》2009年第1期73-76,共4页Journal of Fujian Administration Institute

摘　　要：大陆法系诸国普遍承认的取得时效制度除了在《中华人民共和国民法(草案)》中昙花一现外,只有在学说著作和学者建议稿中方可觅其踪影;刚生效的《中华人民共和国物权法》对取得时效制度亦没有作出规定。取得时效制度在我国本土化的艰难过程,表明了立法者对其价值功能和立法技术的存疑和困惑。从整体上看,规定取得时效制度利大于弊,应在物权立法中有所体现。Acquisitive prescription system recognized universally by the civil law countries is only seen in the academic books and the drafts in addition to people＇s Republic of China Civil Law （Draft）＇ in short-lived which is just put into force and also does not provide regulations on acquisitive prescription system. The difficult process of localization of acquisitive prescription system indicates the legislators＇ doubts and confusion on its value and legislative technology. On the whole, the advantages of regulating acquisitive prescription system exceeded the disadvantages and should be embodied in property legislation.

关 键 词：取得时效 价值功能 立法技术 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]