检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川省什邡市人民医院神经外科,什邡618400
出 处:《中国临床新医学》2008年第B12期40-42,共3页CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE
摘 要:目的探讨3种不同术式治疗额颞部重度颅脑损伤患者的手术效果。方法将108例患者随机分成3组:改良翼点入路组、传统骨瓣组和标准大骨瓣减压组,比较组间治疗有效率和并发症发生率。结果改良翼点入路组在治愈率、伤残率及并发症发生率均明显优于传统骨瓣组和标准大骨瓣减压组(P<0.05)。结论改良翼点入路术兼顾了传统骨瓣和标准大骨瓣减压术的优点,具有显露广泛、减压充分、术中脑膨出发生率低、脑疝容易复位等优点,值得在临床治疗中推广应用。Objective To observe and oompare the effects of three different surgical treatment for heavy craniocerebral injury. Methods The 108 cases were randomly divided into three groups: Improved pterional approach group, the traditional bone group, the standard large trauma decompression group. The efficient rate and complication rate among the three groups were compared. Results Improved pterional approach group was significantly superior to the traditional bone group and the standard large trauma decompression group in the cure rate, the rate of the disabled and the complieation rate(P 〈 0.05). Concision Improved pterional approach surgery has lots of characteristic.s, such as revealed extension, full decompression, with low rate of encephalocele, easily reset of cerebral hernia and .so on. It is an effective way to treat heavy cranioeerehral injury.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229