“宫体诗”的界定及其文体价值辨思——兼释“宫体诗”与“宫体文”的关系  

On the Definition of the Gongti Poetry,Its Style Value,and the Relation between the Gongti Poetry and the Gongti Essay

作　　者：徐艳[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学古籍所,上海200433

出　　处：《复旦学报（社会科学版）》2009年第1期12-24,共13页Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目"文学语言角度的南朝诗歌研究"(项目批准号:07JC751020)的成果之一

摘　　要：本文辩驳了视徐为"宫体诗"创始人之说,指出徐所创"宫体"实为"宫体文",首先体现于教命之书的写作上,其后再扩大至其他文类;其特点为文体的创新。由此判断,这之后的由萧纲为主创立的"宫体诗"当与之一样,都在于文体的创新,而无关乎特定题材(包括女性题材)。在此基础上,本文以萧纲诗歌为分析对象,探究其与前人作品的语言差异,总结渗透于萧纲女性、写景等不同题材诗歌中的共同语言追求,由之观察"宫体诗"的文体价值。This paper thinks it is improper to regard Xu Chi as the father of the Gongti Poetry （ the poetry of imperial style）, which is just a kind of Essay chiefly used in the teaching and ordering and then enlarged its scope to the other genres. Its main character is style innovation. Therefore, the Gongti Poetry initiated by Xiao Gang was also characterized by style innovation rather than certain subjects. The paper makes a research into Xiao Gang＇s poetic works, focusing on his poetic language, and looks into the style value of the Gongti Poetry.

关 键 词：徐 "宫体诗" 萧纲 文体创新 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]